Home

General Information

About Us


CVC Audit Information Download


Contact Us


Display Advertising


Ad Sizes and Samples


Classified Advertising

Communities

Communities Served


Community Resources

-$- Online Store -$-

Digital Online Subscription


Order A Classified Ad Online


Place Assumed Name Notice


Cook County Legals Printed Here


Kane County Name Change - $85


Place Obituary Notice


Download Sample Paper

Submission of News

Engagement Submittal


Birth Announcements


News & Photos


Sports Scores

Lifestyle Features and Videos

Food and Lifestyle


Lifestyle Videos


Seasonal Widget


Crossword and Sudoku Puzzles


Mug Shot Mania News

Online News and Commentary

The Examiner U-46 News Feed


Cheap Seats 2021


Cheap Seats 2020


Cheap Seats 2019


Cheap Seats 2018


Cheap Seats 2017


Cheap Seats 2016


Cheap Seats 2015 B


Cheap Seats 2015


Cheap Seats 2014


Cheap Seats 2013


Cheap Seats 2012


Cheap Seats 2011


Cheap Seats 2010


Ramey DUI Video


Representative Randy Ramey pleads guilty to DUI


Bartlett Volunteer Fire Department Street Dance


The Truth about Global Warming


Examiner Editorials and Cheap Seats from the past

Forms and Newsstand Locations

Newsstand Locations


Carriers needed


Legal Newspaper

The Examiner U-46 News Feed

Split U-46 vote approves food services union pact


By Seth Hancock
  The Board of Education in School District U-46 approved by a 5-2 vote, Phil Costello and Jeanette Ward voting no, on a contract for the district’s food services union, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), at its meeting on Monday, April 1.
  Jeff King, deputy superintendent of operations, said it was a three-year contract with annual pay raises averaging 3 percent. He said the SEIU approved the contract two weeks prior.
  Ward thanked staff and the union representatives for “the hard work of negotiating,” but she said: “This contract is not on par with the private sector and agreements like this perpetuate Illinois’ fiscal problems. I do appreciate some of the directions we’re taking, but I will be voting no.”
  Some of the concerns Ward addressed were pay raises were mostly automatic and the contract allows for pension spiking in the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) as well as benefits that exceed the taxpayers who will be funding the contract but work in the private sector.
  “This contract was drafted with direction from the majority of the board,” Ward said. “I fully appreciate and respect that. This contract provides that raises are automatic and only require that an employee be rated as proficient in order to receive a raise in 2021 and beyond.”
  Regarding the proficiency standard, Ward said: “I do appreciate that that was included and that is a step in the right direction. However, it doesn't go far enough for me. It is very rare in the private sector to receive guaranteed raises not based on performance.”
  After automatic pay raises of 3 percent in the first two years of the contract, employees will need to be evaluated as merely proficient to receive a 2.75 percent increase. Even employees rated less than proficient will also receive automatic pay raises of 1.375 percent.
  Ward added: “Similar to other contracts this board has voted on, this contract provides that employees hired on or before June 30, 2019 may retire at 55 and then provides for a bonus to be paid in the last four months of employment in an amount sufficient to increase an employee’s IMRF earnings in the final 12 months of employment by exactly 6 percent so as to be just below the amount that would incur penalties. As I said previously, and also given that the state has currently $129 billion in unfunded pension liability, I don’t think that pension spiking should be permitted at all.”
  Ward said that she appreciates that the pension spiking practice ends for new hires after June 30, 2019 saying, “that is a good and fantastic direction.”
  U-46 will pay 85 percent of health care costs compared to 15 percent by the employees.
  “I work for a company that offers very competitive pay and benefits, and my employer pays 75 percent of the insurance premium and I pay 25 percent,” Ward said. “And that is quite common in the private sector.”

.

.

.




©2021 Examiner Publications, Inc.

Website Powered by Web Construction Set